Quote:
Originally Posted by TurtleBoy
No, you are making up statistics to back an argument that is not being discussed. Future trends have nothing to do with your original statement.
|
Are you delusional or just try to poke above class? You came up with 3 series statistics. My argument was about the X3 - the hood, doors sides etc. not its grille. Do you know how to dissect an argument from P1 to Px = Conclusion and evaluate along ARG ? (Acceptability Relevance grounds)? You came up with the 3 series sales and self embarassed with a comment that had nothing to do with the X3 its proportions my argument. Or perhaps you were anchored by the amateurish replies and fallacies and sucocmbed to anchor bias? For sure your 3 series links provided are sample bias and not even relevant to the X3 nor even the grille argument. I can do this at the graduate levels but it will be badly embarrassing to you. Do you have anything to comment wrt my original reply and argument? No one made statistics, you came with links referring to quantitative arguments that were irrelevant to the qualitative argument at hand. You then challenged for numbers and were embarassed by the numbers reply you got. Sorry but I cannot cram here common sense not critical thinking. Can you specify what statistic was invented and cite Specifically ? The 1.92% is based on published BMW numbers. You throw numbers but cannot handle what they mean. FYI in university they do teach varying critical thinking research tools and so on. Finishing college and going a level up is highly recommended. At the graduate level it is beyond argumentation, but the finite analysis of the methodology used to postulate a thesis and much more. 1.92 % take it or go back to school to learn reading BMWs own corporate reports. Which BTW in case you do not know are legal and regulatory requirements …