12-11-2012, 02:42 PM | #23 |
Major
380
Rep 1,095
Posts |
The Model S is really interesting. I could see myself in something like that one day, but for now internal combustion still does the trick.
I could really rock one of these http://www.bmw-i.com/en_ww/bmw-i8/ But I will never be able to afford one :-( |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 02:49 PM | #24 | |
Major
380
Rep 1,095
Posts |
Quote:
Not in my lifetime, though. If it does, I could rock one of these too http://www.bmwgroup.com/e/0_0_www_bm...eanenergy.html Unfortunately I will not likely be able to afford that either :-( |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 03:13 PM | #25 |
E9X > Everything
60
Rep 742
Posts |
I saw one in August parked outside my dad and I's favorite mexican place. That car is so gorgeous.
I won't be getting one but I'm suggesting one for my dad since he drives about ~100 miles away and needs a new ride...and I might get to drive it occasionally too. I can't wait to see how automobiles have changed in 15 years when I'll have good money to put down on a nice car, everything in the world has been advancing so fast. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 03:58 PM | #26 |
boku no namae ha...
344
Rep 11,023
Posts
Drives: 2006 BS 330i
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: S. Bay Area, CA + Newark, NJ + ChiCity + True Blue
|
my friend picked me up in a Model S last friday. have to say... i was thoroughly impressed. this was the top end model--not sure what all the gadgets were but i guess it was the 'performance model' with bucket seats and what not.
first impressions was it reminded me of the porsche pa benamera in size and shape. exterior beauty is subjective obviously, but i personally think from the front and rear, the car looks amazing. i'm not that happy with the sides tho--it might be because of the chrome trim, which i'm not very fond of. i sat in the back, and those leather seats were pretty damn comfortable. i wasn't expecting it to be as roomy either, but it can definitely fit wider/taller people. the center piece is basically that huge ass touch screen. controls pretty much everything in the car from music/sound to temperature, etc--plus you can surf the internets without straining ur eyes! (not that you would want to do that while driving) not sure how much power the engine was rated... im guessing 350-400hp on the higher end model? torque on tap through manhattan... pretty much overkill, but nonetheless very fun. overall i liked the car. i would definitely consider a lower end model in the future.
__________________
looking for a PreLCI Black Sapphire e90 front bumper without license plate holes
"Akimbo shotguns. Broken wrists anyone? And don't give me that 'it's just a game' bull****. Where the **** are my akimbo interventions then?! One scope on each eye mother****er!!" |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 04:10 PM | #27 |
Brigadier General
5180
Rep 3,956
Posts
Drives: '23 G80 M3C xDrive; '13 e92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Southern California
|
Quite possibly. But I'm sure many other car companies, including BMW (as they have already started) will be creating hybrid and electric sports cars to match, or even exceed, Tesla.
I just want some exhaust/engine noise! Even it if its fake...
__________________
2023 G80 M3 Competition xDrive Isle of Man Green on Kyalami Orange full leather - 826M black wheels - Carbon Fiber Trim - Carbon Bucket Seats - Executive/Driving Assist/Parking Packages - Laserlight - M Shadowline Lights - M Drive Pro - CS Trans/Diff/Steering Coding
2013 E92 M3 Mineral White on Bamboo Beige noviello leather (Base w/ Nav, Comfort Access, Lighting Pack) - DINAN Stage 1 and Free Flow Axle-Back Exhaust |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 04:17 PM | #28 |
Private
2
Rep 58
Posts |
I thought about a tesla before the 335is I just bought. I was at the showroom and asked how much it would cost to drive between Seattle and Portland. 420 miles round trip. Answer was just a couple of bucks. So I asked how long the charge in Portland or at 3/4 empty. Something like 12 hours at 110 volts. So the trip is not one day it's two and a night stay at $200.00 plus food the charge the battery.
So these cars are daily commuters and test beds. Fast yes! Pretty yes! Practical. Not really. However the 300 mile range had me considering the car seriously. Also that range varies depending on heating and cooling requirement in the car. The colder it is the less range due to battery inefficiencies. The charge time just killed me though. Give me a heat engine any day right now. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 07:47 PM | #29 |
The Tanzanian
1383
Rep 1,521
Posts
Drives: BMW M3, Audi RS6, Mini Cooper
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
If they get their supercharger network up and running quickly enough it might not be so bad since they can charge in 30 minutes. I usually get rental cars for long trips so the range thing doesn't bother me too much in that sense. Unfortunately if you're living in an apartment it would be really difficult since you likely could not install their chargers and using the standard 110V outlets takes forever like you say.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 08:26 PM | #30 |
Lieutenant Colonel
86
Rep 1,849
Posts |
220 is easily installable in most houses, and that would halve the charge time. Pretty soon they'll have home-installable superchargers (see what I did there?) which will give a full charge in a matter of a few dozens of minutes rather than a few hours.
__________________
2011 E90 / Premium Package / Stage 2 PPK / Performance Suspension
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 08:27 PM | #31 |
Lieutenant Colonel
86
Rep 1,849
Posts |
And it won't be long before new battery tech is implemented.
__________________
2011 E90 / Premium Package / Stage 2 PPK / Performance Suspension
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 08:49 PM | #32 |
First Lieutenant
13
Rep 394
Posts
Drives: 2008 335i sedan
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Berkley, MI
|
I don't see Tesla as a viable concern in 2-3 years, and I don't see Fisker as a viable concern in 2013. Sure, someone big could snap up the name and brand and keep them going, but they are just not in a market that provides enough cash flow for a car business.
__________________
Bronze
2008 335i sedan | black/black | Sport | Premium |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 09:04 PM | #33 |
Captain
38
Rep 715
Posts |
Today, a friend of mine took me for an hour ride in his brand new Tesla S.
Smooth, quiet and powerful. 0-60 in 4.4 seconds. And no tranny! The only sound comes from the tires. Two huge screens, which seems like an overkill. Refined. And expensive: $93K - $10K in tax credits (in CA). After I got out of his car and back into mine, mine felt like old technology but much sportier. If I could afford one, I'd consider it as a second car. But I'd keep my 3 series too. Last edited by driverman; 12-11-2012 at 09:10 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 09:58 PM | #34 |
E9X > Everything
60
Rep 742
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 10:57 PM | #35 |
General
19273
Rep 19,764
Posts |
And you know this how?
Listen until gasoline, and all its synthetic substitutes are gone, the electric car is not going to be a viable alternative to the internal combustion engine. Until electric batteries reach the energy density of gasoline (which they never will) electric cars will be the vehicle of the rich and famous planet-savers and that's about it. Ion Musk thinks he can become the next Henry Ford, but it will never happen. Musk is trying to replace a technology that is cheap and plentiful with something that is expensive and not functional. ICE car: drive 500 miles fill up with a new load of fuel in 5 minutes. Electric car: drive 230 miles and fill up with a new load of fuel in 1.5 hours (best case scenario for a full charge). Go do the math. You need to understand this simple fact. Jet airplanes, which allow for cheap, efficient, international travel run on petroleum-based fuel. They do because the energy density is so high for jet fuel (i.e. gasoline, diesel, etc.). In other words, it is a light-weight fuel. Until the last drop (source) of light-weight, high-energy density jet fuel is about to go away, no other fuel alternative will be economically viable. This means that the industrial infrastructure that supports jet fuel will be around to make gasoline and diesel, which means ICE cars will rule the day for many lifetimes to come. Just accept these facts and move on. Let's keep on the path of higher efficiency of burning petroleum fuel in our cars; we'll be better for it. Rant over... |
Appreciate
0
|
12-12-2012, 03:04 AM | #36 |
Lieutenant
190
Rep 585
Posts |
Definitely would get its super fast. There are no more trips to gas stations. No more oil changes. Next to no maintenance.
As for the naysayers it's a rare day that your going to drive the 200+ miles in a single day. Most places you could go have a charger somewhere nearby and more being added daily. Renting a car for the once a year drive to grandmas house actually has many benefits. Currently battery technology is one of the largest area of research by both private and public funding. The government even is working on what they refer to as a modern day manhattan project for battery research. Tesla is a breath of fresh air. Building from the ground up a car that can compete with the top brands.... And it's electric. I cannot wait to see what they do in the future if this is there starting point. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-12-2012, 05:40 AM | #38 | |
General
19273
Rep 19,764
Posts |
Quote:
It all comes down to cost of ownership and the benefit ratio. The Tesla S is a great achievement and could function in a lot of owner situations, but the model that provides a comfortable range of over 200 miles on a charge is around $85K. When you can buy a comparable ICE car for $50K, the extra $35K pays for the fuel for almost the vehicle's entire life time. Almost everyone here poo-poos the Chevy Volt. Most people here laugh that it will never sell in the numbers it is projected to by GM. But as a extended range battery electric car, it's a dammed nice first try and actually fits the targeted owner profile almost perfectly, who are those people that drive about 40 miles a day. In a single car you can drive all or mostly on battery for daily driving duties, and if need be switch over to gas power generation for extended trips. I'd get a Volt way before I'd get a Tesla S if I had to make the decision today and had a commute profile that fit either car's cost-value profile (but I don't). Last edited by Efthreeoh; 12-12-2012 at 06:07 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-12-2012, 05:42 AM | #39 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 143
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-12-2012, 07:37 AM | #41 |
Save The Manuals!
64
Rep 491
Posts |
Who sees a Tesla in their future?
I'd rather drive a BMW. (Or better, a Porsche!)
Using Tesla's calculator http://www.teslamotors.com/financing and considering my driving habits (multiple vehicles, telecommute) gas would need to rise to over $60/gallon before it made any sense for me, and that's just for the operating costs. @ $84,900 for the "performance" version -- no, I don't ever see a Tesla in my future. Honda offers an electric Fit EV lease (only) for $389/month while GM offers the Volt for $329/mo plus $2999 (= $412). If the cost were maybe half or one-third of that, it might be fun to have an electric Fit as a spare car.
__________________
2008 E91 36K, 6-speed, RWD, Alpine, Terra, Xenons, ZSP, ZCW, ZPP, PDC, CA, alarm, M shifter and M brake handle, Euro rear fog light switch, Euro aspheric mirrors, rear power outlets, Euro split armrest, Lidatek, remote V-1, Cocomats, beach sand, $10 clutch stop mod. 1998 Volvo V70T5 231K, 5-speed, original clutch (third clutch pedal!), aspheric driver's mirror, E-code headlights, IPD sway bar, strut tower brace & skidplate.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-12-2012, 07:51 AM | #42 | |
Lieutenant
22
Rep 549
Posts |
Quote:
With the loss of the ability of taxing fuel I wonder where governments will make up for the loss in revenue. My next car will be a petrol or diesel, the car after that I hope will be electric. Tesla or not, but at least 500 miles autonomy. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-12-2012, 09:36 AM | #43 | |
Lieutenant
39
Rep 433
Posts |
Quote:
Since our economy is built on the concept of generally doing things as cheaply as possible, this may never happen in our lifetimes. However, if we could pull this off in the next 10 - 20 years I do believe that stopping the shipment of all of our dollars overseas to quench are insatiable oil thirst will solve nearly every single problem our country has! THINK ABOUT IT! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-12-2012, 11:38 AM | #44 |
Lieutenant General
2049
Rep 13,378
Posts |
The trouble with Hydorgen and Batteries is
They both require exotic materials.
The catalyst in a Fuel cell is Platinum or one or a combination of exotic metals of which there isn't a large supply . Of course Musk is looking at space mining. With batteries we have Lithium which is also a somewhat rare material. So there needs to be breakthroughs in these area's, as in find substitutes that are practical on a large scale . It would be a nice dream to have personal Energy Independence on a large scale. Solar and Wind at your house and off the grid for the most part . |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|