04-10-2008, 03:49 AM | #1 |
Major General
2280
Rep 5,364
Posts |
new RS6: 0-100 in 4.2s, 0-200 in 13.5s.
AutoZeitung: Alpina B5S vs. Audi RS6 B5S RS6 €97 900 €106 900 Round 1 "Karroserie" : Larger luggage capacity and space for passengers gives victory to the Audu RS6 Round 2: "Fahrkomfort": The nicer "dialled in" have more comfort.The Alpina B5 is also equipped wtih comfort seats whic hare alot more comfortable than the sport seats of the RS6. Round 3: Motor / Getriebe: Win for the Alpina B5S. More cultivated and less loud than the bi-turbo V10 of the RS6. Also with a top speed of 313 km/h it's alot mroe than the Ingolstädter. For €1600 a 280 km/h option is available. Round 4: Fahrdynamilk: With firstclass brakes the Audi RS6 sets a benchmark. Round 5: Umwelt / Kosten: The smaller costs has the Alpina B5S: cheaper to buy as new, better exhaust values and lower insurance. €60 000 in loss the first four years. SUMMARY: When sumamrized the points, the Alpina B5S Touring is clearly in front. It is a very solid car but neverthelss a very primitive; like a ironfist in a velvetglove. The Audi RS6 is the more active driving car and when you want to, more sportier. But when comfort and top speed it cannot keep pace with the Alpina. They are both full family and everyday cars despite driving capabilities of Lamborghini-level. B5S Touring vs. RS6 Avant 0-60 km/h 2,3s 2,0s 0-100 km/h 4,4s 4,2s 0-140 km/h 7,2s 7,2s 0-160 km/h 9,2s 8,8s 0-180 km/h 11,3s 10,1s 0-200 km/h 13,9s 13,5s Top speed: 313 km/h 250 / 280 km/h Handling: 1,51:7 min 1,48,5 min Slalom pylondistance 18 m 61,1 km/h 63,6 km/h Braking cold: 36,7 36,5 Braking warm: 34,2 33 ,9 Test consump: 1,62 l/ 10 km 1, 73 / 10 km CO2: 296 g/ km 333 g/km TOTAL POINTS: 3143 3095 of 5000
__________________
|
04-10-2008, 03:52 AM | #2 |
Major General
2280
Rep 5,364
Posts |
The Alpina wins due to better comfort and economy. That's not why I made the post though. The RS6's acceleration is amazing! look at the figures and tracktimes.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2008, 06:48 AM | #5 |
General
1586
Rep 29,215
Posts |
__________________
F10 520d M-Sport Alpine White | HRE P43SC 20x9+20x11 | Michelin PSS 255/35+295/30 | KW V3 Coilover | M5 Front Sway Bar + M550d Rear Sway Bar | 3DDesign Front Lip | BMW M Performance CF Spoiler | BMW M Performance Diffuser | BMW M Performance Black Grills | BMW M Performance Pedals | |
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2008, 07:38 AM | #7 |
Major General
1230
Rep 8,034
Posts |
hkz786,
I also posted something similar on the M3 site. The RS6 times are incredible, the 60mph time is great but to be expected due to Quattro and the power, but the 100mph and the 125mph times are real eye openers, 8.8s to reach 100mph is better than any M5 time I know of and possibly better than any M6 time as well and both times were achieved in Europe not the US. Imagine what will be achieved by some of the US mags when they get their hands on a saloon version. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2008, 03:28 PM | #11 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,369
Posts |
Hahaha!! Of course, then it would be 0-160 kph in 4.2!! No car in the world I think does that. I think.
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|