02-02-2007, 01:36 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
530
Rep 1,701
Posts |
30 Year Fixed or ARM???
Question: according to my math, the current payments on a 1 million dollar 30 year fixed is 6418. For the 5/1 ARM interest only, it’s about 5428. So, about $100 different per month. Other than the risk of rates going up in the future, is anything lost by taking the 5/1 io and paying an extra $1000 every month to reduce principal?
In which scenario do I have more equity on 5 years? |
02-02-2007, 01:51 PM | #2 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 128
Posts |
I think it all depends upon the variance between the loan interest rate and the local market appreciation rates...
__________________
325i Jet Black on Black interior, Alum trim, ZSP, NAV, Step, Xenons.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-02-2007, 02:03 PM | #3 |
Major
55
Rep 1,159
Posts |
No expert, but my quick thoughts are that since the first 10-12yrs of a 30yr fixed is going toward interest that the ARM / and paying 60k principle would net you more equity sooner.
Might look at doing 30yr fixed on 80% and a short term, higher interest loan on the 20%. If you went that way, say a 10yr loan on the 20% you'd have 20% equity at the end of that loan. That's how we went, just because it was the cheapest monthly. The rate on the 80% came down enough by putting 20% down (I'd like to salute the people who can actually put down 20% on today's housing prices) to more than cover the payment on borrowing that 20%. Go figure. Equity isn't our primary concern though. The market out here has never died in the 20+ years I've lived here. It's slowed, but never died. I know the equity in my house has to come from appreciation and not by paying off the mortgage. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-02-2007, 02:10 PM | #4 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
530
Rep 1,701
Posts |
Quote:
Excellent insight!!! Thanks!!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|