[NewYearsBoy]

Originally Posted by pman10

You're right that the boxster spyder is made for a special person. Not someone who thinks less is more, but someone who values performance over amenities. I really do not think that it was designed as a daily driver - it's stripped out design would make it impractical and uncomfortable.

I agree^^

Originally Posted by TK-421

I'm sorry... but I don't think anyone... who buys... a Boxter Spyder... dd's... it..............................

I agree.... ... .. .. .. .. . . .... .......

Originally Posted by 335iMIAMI

.......I'm....pretty sure......anyone who would own one........would have a fleet of cars....If I owned one I would never have the top up............only take it out on sunny days.......leave it topless all the time.....

........ .. . .. .. .. .. ... U guys are harsh... ... .. .. ...

[Epik]

Originally Posted by Nikkahtropolis

Bro, those cars are hardly comparable. You couldn't drive an Ariel in rain, for one. Might as well throw out a Caterham model. I prefer those over Atoms as a whole.

Hardly comparable?

You couldn't drive an atom in the rain is why they're hardly comparable?

You actually could drive an atom in the rain, for one.

And two, the reason I bring up the Atom is because words like "ultimate" were being thrown around in regards to the boxster spyder. Please...

[Year's_End]

Originally Posted by Epik

Hardly comparable?

You couldn't drive an atom in the rain is why they're hardly comparable?

You actually could drive an atom in the rain, for one.

And two, the reason I bring up the Atom is because words like "ultimate" were being thrown around in regards to the boxster spyder. Please...

No, my point is that you're not going to be seeing people driving Atoms on the street. You're comparing a purpose-built track car versus a lightened street car.

Not comparable.