BMW X3 Forum
BMW X3 Forum
Welcome to the ultimate G45 BMW X3 community.
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-11-2014, 02:43 PM   #23
Manbnda
Second Lieutenant
60
Rep
258
Posts

Drives: F30 AW
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MX

iTrader: (0)

I don't know what the sales figures and tendency of the new Cayman, 911, Jaguar F Type which are proper sport cars are, but it comes to my attention the cars listed in the article: TT, SLK and Z4.
Who want those cars anyway?

I wonder if BMW knows the importance and potential of the next M2. If BMW doesn't put a CFR on it, it will be pretty clear to me their lack of...

Last edited by Manbnda; 11-11-2014 at 04:11 PM..
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 02:46 PM   #24
ORIGIN M.
Banned
3160
Rep
9,134
Posts

Drives: ///M
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Hemisphere

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by z19930612
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-sauerkraut
Explains why makers like Honda do not have any sports cars in their two car lines.
Civic SI?
That's not a proper sports car...

And it looks like the unemployed designers from Saturn designed it.

The only thing good is the 6 spd tranny they robbed from the TSX.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 02:48 PM   #25
ORIGIN M.
Banned
3160
Rep
9,134
Posts

Drives: ///M
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Hemisphere

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Bubble
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-sauerkraut View Post
Explains why makers like Honda do not have any sports cars in their two car lines.
I give you Civic Type R
Yeah Europe only.

And that's a quasi sports car.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 02:53 PM   #26
puma1552
Banned
30
Rep
380
Posts

Drives: '14 Mustang GT Premium
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Twin Cities

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manbnda View Post
I don't know what the sales figures and tendency of the new Cayman, 911, Jaguar F Type which are proper sport cars, but it comes to my attention the cars listed in the article: TT, SLK and Z4.
Who want those cars anyway?
Seen the interior of the upcoming 2015 TT yet? It's one of the nicest interiors I've ever seen.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 02:55 PM   #27
fcman
Captain
678
Rep
991
Posts

Drives: 2023 G87
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manbnda View Post
I don't know what the sales figures and tendency of the new Cayman, 911, Jaguar F Type which are proper sport cars, but it comes to my attention the cars listed in the article: TT, SLK and Z4.
Who want those cars anyway?
Yeah I think that's the biggest problem for the Z4 and BMW, they think that the TT and SLK should be their competition, so they design a soccer-mom oriented roadster and call it a sports car. Meanwhile the Boxster, in the same price bracket but a proper sports car, is selling twice as many units as the Z and last month 10x more than the TT. Boxster and Cayman together sold 4x more than the Z4. So, BMW, sports cars aren't dead, YOUR "sports cars" are dead. Moms aren't spending 50k+ on 2-seaters, but plenty of enthusiasts are.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 03:08 PM   #28
M3 Adjuster
Banned
Albania
7914
Rep
11,785
Posts

Drives: 1M, X1 M Sport, E46 325ic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas, Tx

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fcman
. So, BMW, sports cars aren't dead, YOUR "sports cars" are dead.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 03:15 PM   #29
nachob
Brigadier General
United_States
2349
Rep
4,347
Posts

Drives: 2004 330i ZHP, 2022 Cayman T
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blipit_ View Post
No BMW, it is your so-called sports cars that aren't selling. No one wants your hard-top convertible sports cars for a reason.

Build a proper fixed roof affordable sports car and it will sell.

Cars like the Stingray are selling like gangbusters. Less expensive car like the next gen Miata is going to fly of the showroom floors.

BMW execs, ask yourself this question. Would you buy a Z4 for the same price as a Boxster or Cayman? Lets see a Z4 35is or a Boxster/Cayman S...yeah exactly.
I agree build proper sports cars that are more reasonable to own as weekend cars and the wealthy would pick them up. BMW is trying to build jack of all trades sports car for comfort and luxury that really make no one happy. Focused cars like frs Brz. Corvette are flying off shelves because they are high value focused cars. Status is now shown by the SUV but many would still want a fun, less expensive weekend car that BMW doesn't make. Look at every car BMW makes now. They all have the exact same SUV cockpit with comfort everything, nav idrive folding everything. The only difference is the weight. Not even interior space as new SUVs like X6 have the same or even less interior room than a sedan. I think the age where expensive sports car defines status is gone. There is a new frugality after the crash where luxury is masked by "utility". People can fee good about their rolling palace because they can say it's great for carrying kids and leather is not cool because it smells or feels good
But because it wipes clean easier. People even justify the x6 because it has an SUV label even though it weighs 5000 lbs and has no more room than a 5 series sedan 1000 lbs less. BMW is lost at the moment, they need focus. They need dr. Z back like Apple needed Steve jobs back when they were selling at $12 share. Many here defend everything BMW does but this does little to help BMW mature into its new physical size. They are following now more often than leading and when they lead it's often silly things like no dipsticks, forced run flats, fake sound and ever softer suspensions . Their claim to fame was great steering feel and that is a work in progress and while pretty good not sure they lead in that. I just drove new fwd gti. I don't like fwd! But at 25K it was a blast, fun, comfortable. At that price point anyone can own a big lux SUV and buy a Gti, Brz, firs as their runabout sports Car. I am rooting for BMW to make a
Comeback like apple did when they were lost!

Last edited by nachob; 11-11-2014 at 08:06 PM..
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 03:20 PM   #30
Red Bread
Major General
United_States
4458
Rep
9,160
Posts

Drives: Smog machines
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

I'd be curious what the trend looks like if you just add the Boxster into sales figures. Z3's were priced between the Miata and Boxster and made a little sense. The first Z4 was still priced well under the Boxster, but this last one tried to take on the massively better Porsche head on. Of course it hasn't sold well.

Get back to the Z3 roots and you'd likely find success again. And oh yeah, build us a reasonably small and light rwd sedan while you're at it.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 03:29 PM   #31
Qunadry
First Lieutenant
United_States
31
Rep
388
Posts

Drives: 2012 135i
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northeast

iTrader: (0)

This statement is nothing more than BMW justifying Grand Coupe's, 2 series active tourer, etc.. My next personal car will not be a new BMW.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 03:30 PM   #32
stealth.pilot
Knight Commander
stealth.pilot's Avatar
United Kingdom
572
Rep
5,948
Posts

Drives: 2014 911 Turbo S
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Buckhead

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
I call bullshit. BMW just doesn't know how to build them.

Porsche and Jaguar are killing it in sports cars.
__________________
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS 580
2020 Mercedes-Benz GLE 450
Ordered: EQS580, BMW IX, Lucid Air Touring, Corvette Stingray
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 03:52 PM   #33
W///
Lieutenant General
W///'s Avatar
7886
Rep
12,459
Posts

Drives: F82GTS, E36/E92M3, Z4M
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SC

iTrader: (13)

Quote:
Originally Posted by puma1552 View Post
Agree with all of the above, and most of the sentiment here. I remember when a Z4 was very nicely equipped for around $40k. Now it's $70k?? Sorry, but my middle/upper middle class income hasn't increased by 75% in the last decade, so forget the Z4. For comparison, my GT stickered for $42k. Had BMW offered me a nicely equipped Z4 with its retractable hardtop (for year round driving in the north) for $40k-$45k, it would've been a 50/50 shot between the two. But, I couldn't even consider the Z4 at the asinine price BMW wants for it.

We are now at the point of $80k+ M3s. A $100k 3 series is just a few years away, no joke. I mean seriously?

Agreed on the 328i - $50k-$60k for a basic 3 series is laughable too. Why do I have to pay $475 for a fucking split folding rear seat? Why hasn't this been de facto standard since the 1980s?

Problem is, everyone says BMW's pricing is a joke, but nobody votes with their wallets - they get right into another lease and BMW makes money hand over fist, year in, year out. Now all BMW offers is an extremely diluted market of severely overpriced vehicles. 15 years ago I never thought in a million years that BMW (and other Germans, BMW isn't the only one here) would be selling $50k+ 2015 vehicles with halogen headlights. But the market hasn't spoken loud enough, and people just keep buying them up.
They charge that much because they can. Plain and simple. If this wasn't working, they wouldn't keep beating last years sales number every single month.

It's not like it's a BMW thing only. Look at the German counterparts. Hell, I was building an Accord sedan online and that was nearly $30k. Have you seen what 4Runners go for nowadays? Crazy. Hell you just said your Mustang was $42k. What were base V8 Mustangs going for in 2004? Certainly not that.

I plan on buying 1 new car (just to be able to feel that experience of custom ordering my own M2 or M3) and then that's it. Makes so much more sense to buy used and not take a bath on cars nowadays.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT
08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT
07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT
99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 03:56 PM   #34
templarklimek
templarklimek
United_States
147
Rep
868
Posts

Drives: 15' X6M, 12' R8 V10,
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston Texas

iTrader: (0)

I owned an last generation Z4M Coupe which I miss to this day. It was a pure sports car even with it quirks. I now own a E92 M3 and M6. I miss the purer Z4 badly but the current one does nothing for me at all. It's not a sports car at all, it's a touring 2 seater. That's fine, but if they want me to buy another it needs the following.

REAL hard top coupe
Manual tranny
REAL M version with M4 power

I see them sit on dealer lots for a VERY long time.. Take the hint BMW, stop selling this version and build a real Z4 again. This version of the Z4 has been dead in the water for 2 years.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:09 PM   #35
Luminor513
Major
Luminor513's Avatar
1270
Rep
1,495
Posts

Drives: 2020 G07 x40i BSM/Blk Merino
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South Florida

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dackelone
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmPower View Post
This is a whole lot of c***. Compare the trim levels to the said cars in 2007/08 to what they are like now. If the Z4 was 15K cheaper base price, it would have made all the difference in the world. There is still a market for 30K+ good quality luxury sports run abouts; its just the Germans in their greed overestimated what a market could absorb and lost the plot. Not a lot of buyers want to spend 50+K on an average performing pig when there are much better alternatives for the same price
^^Well said! +1.

The Z4's biggest problem is the Porsche Cayman and new Vette. The Z4 is just far too pricey new. The smart person would buy a low miles one CPO and save a ton. BMW really should drop the Z4's price $10K to $15K, then the car might have a fighting chance for the next year or two until a new niche model comes out.
+1 exactly! Bmw should adjust the MSRP 10-15k and hope to squeeze out some reasonable sales on what's left in the life of the Z4. Dodge just did the same thing with the Viper MSRP as they are having a huge problem selling them and they are piling up on dodge dealership lots.
__________________
2020 G07 x40i BSM/Blk Merino
2022 Audi E-tron S Mythos Blk/Blk Valcona
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:10 PM   #36
onatuesday
Captain
157
Rep
965
Posts

Drives: Hyundai
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: TX

iTrader: (0)

This statement by BMW really shows how out of touch BMW has become.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:10 PM   #37
BMWnStuff
Private
1
Rep
45
Posts

Drives: 2013 328i
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (0)

I would agree with the general sentiment here. The BMW 3-Series has always been one of the cars with the best value to car ratio. It's always a hell of a car. But at the point at which they can charge $40k for a basic 328i and still deliver it with halogens and a corolla brings projectors standard at less than half the price? Like really... If you want to build the jack of all trades, put money into the small things in a car that make the most difference.

The M235i was supposed to be BMW's jackpot getting into the kind of market with a cost-effective yet luxurious sports car, yet they turned it into a performance coupe instead of a sports car to sell more. Decisions like this can kill a brand.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:11 PM   #38
clbmw
Major
643
Rep
1,491
Posts

Drives: 320d M135i
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

...yet we are seeing more HyperCars than ever? Something doesn't add up
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:14 PM   #39
BMWnStuff
Private
1
Rep
45
Posts

Drives: 2013 328i
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by clbmw
...yet we are seeing more HyperCars than ever? Something doesn't add up
The 0.1% that can afford them are still out there.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:14 PM   #40
Manbnda
Second Lieutenant
60
Rep
258
Posts

Drives: F30 AW
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by puma1552 View Post
Seen the interior of the upcoming 2015 TT yet? It's one of the nicest interiors I've ever seen.
Yes, I agree it's pretty sweet. And the engine is quite a strong 4 cyl.
Still, I would like a comparable RWD BMW...
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:16 PM   #41
BMW GENIUS
First Lieutenant
154
Rep
397
Posts

Drives: 2015 AW M235i 6MT
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Manly, NSW, Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fcman View Post
I love roadsters (drove an S2000 for years) but I never even remember that BMW makes one. They are so outrageously expensive, a Boxster S is $3,000 less than a Z4 s-drive35is (what a stupid name)... Of course no one is going to buy the BMW.
Not to mention that between the Z4 and the Boxster/Cayman are moving in complete different directions. While the Z4 gets fatter, the Boxsters and Caymans have been cutting down on weight. I mean if I work for BMW and OWN an E85 Z4 myself, it says a lot when I admit that I believe that money is better spent on the Boxster and Cayman itself. Even if Porsche is infamous at raping your wallet between trim levels.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:22 PM   #42
Dog Face Pony Soldier
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
Dog Face Pony Soldier's Avatar
United_States
9705
Rep
6,445
Posts

Drives: M Sport 335i
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 335i  [9.74]
This is a company with a 3 cylinder engine and fake engine sound in their flagship sports car... Proudly proclaiming that this is their vision of the "sports car of the future." If they keep on this path a continued downturn in their sports car sales should be expected.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:33 PM   #43
puma1552
Banned
30
Rep
380
Posts

Drives: '14 Mustang GT Premium
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Twin Cities

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by W/// View Post
They charge that much because they can. Plain and simple. If this wasn't working, they wouldn't keep beating last years sales number every single month.

It's not like it's a BMW thing only. Look at the German counterparts. Hell, I was building an Accord sedan online and that was nearly $30k. Have you seen what 4Runners go for nowadays? Crazy. Hell you just said your Mustang was $42k. What were base V8 Mustangs going for in 2004? Certainly not that.

I plan on buying 1 new car (just to be able to feel that experience of custom ordering my own M2 or M3) and then that's it. Makes so much more sense to buy used and not take a bath on cars nowadays.
And that reinforces my whole point - people aren't voting with their wallets. I went to the Merc dealer a week ago to look at cars for the wife, they had an entire line of ML SUVs with halogens - about 25 of them in a row, not one with the lighting package. I mean really? In fact on the front page right under this story is another headline that says BMW Group sales were up 11.1% in October.

In fairness to the Mustang though, a base '14 GT stickers for like $31k, and can be had for $27k all day long. Mine's a premium with a lot of options. Though even at a sticker of $42k, let's admit the domestic MSRPs for non-limited production vehicles are a bit of a joke - I only paid $34.5k and it was a special order, got high book value on my trade as well.

I agree though, cars across the board - Hondas included - have increased in price at a ratio much greater than middle/upper middle class incomes, though I think the Germans have risen the most.

If nothing else, I'd like to see some of the more absurd/comical stuff come standard on $50k luxury cars in 2015 - things like xenons which have now been around since the late '90s (hard to believe it's been almost 20 years), split folding rear seats, etc. This is a place where BMW could just be a leader and say "We are going to be the first mainstream company to make Xenons standard across the range from here on out" at which point other manufacturers would follow, but as long as people keep buying the ugly, boring black no-line halogen premium cars off the lots, they have no reason to make any of these things standard. But they will instead take away your dipstick and stiff you with crummy run flats. People just aren't voting with their wallets, so it's kind of hard to blame BMW or any other auto maker.

At some point I expect Scott to stop in here and preach the company line that market research shows people want junk like the 2er Active Tourer. And maybe they do, but at least know the competition and your demographic when you think about making a ~300 hp car cost $70k in 2015 - those who can afford it don't want it, and those who want it want it for about $40k. Z4 or Stingray? Not a tough choice.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2014, 04:34 PM   #44
NickyC
Lieutenant General
NickyC's Avatar
19305
Rep
11,212
Posts

Drives: M4 CS. Former G82, x2 F82, F80
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jacked out of my mind

iTrader: (23)

Quote:
Originally Posted by templarklimek View Post
I owned an last generation Z4M Coupe which I miss to this day. It was a pure sports car even with it quirks. I now own a E92 M3 and M6. I miss the purer Z4 badly but the current one does nothing for me at all. It's not a sports car at all, it's a touring 2 seater. That's fine, but if they want me to buy another it needs the following.

REAL hard top coupe
Manual tranny
REAL M version with M4 power

I see them sit on dealer lots for a VERY long time.. Take the hint BMW, stop selling this version and build a real Z4 again. This version of the Z4 has been dead in the water for 2 years.
I owned a Z4M Roadster for a few years before I sold it. I missed it so much, I just bought another one this past summer. I've owned 8 ///M cars, and the Z4M is my favorite car I've ever driven.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.




x3:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST