03-28-2015, 11:10 PM | #6469 |
Major General
1298
Rep 7,389
Posts |
__________________
|
Appreciate
1
|
03-29-2015, 12:23 PM | #6471 |
Brigadier General
2613
Rep 3,535
Posts |
At 3,849 feet, Mt. Diablo is not that high, but its location makes its viewshed spectacular. On a clear day you can see the Sierra Nevada, Yosemite's Sentinel Ridge, all 8 bridges on the SF bay and Mt. Lassen from the visitor center at the top. This is shot from the east side (Sac River Delta).
Diablo from the East by lennycarl08, on Flickr |
Appreciate
1
|
03-30-2015, 02:53 PM | #6472 |
Private First Class
62
Rep 198
Posts
Drives: 2021 BMW 540i xDrive Shadowlin
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee
|
This photo I took while playing around on the Ice over Lake Michigan from Atwater Beach. Just North of Milwaukee. The Ice went out over 500 feet, I wish I did a better job of showing the scale of this.
Atwater Beach by Reuben Neese, on Flickr I also tried to do a little time-lapse with a GoPro, so I threw this little video together. I'm new to video editing and keep trying to come up with projects that force me to learn it. Constructive criticism is always welcome. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2015, 04:54 PM | #6473 |
Major General
1298
Rep 7,389
Posts |
I like both the video and the still.
I think that the wide-angle lens of the Go-Pro did show the vastness pretty well. I wonder if you'd been able to shoot from a few feet higher if that would have shown more, but it works as is.
__________________
|
Appreciate
1
|
03-30-2015, 09:29 PM | #6474 |
Brigadier General
2613
Rep 3,535
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
|
03-31-2015, 09:01 PM | #6475 |
Free Thinker
19462
Rep 7,556
Posts |
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2015, 09:16 PM | #6476 |
Major General
1298
Rep 7,389
Posts |
3-30-2015
Waxing Gibbous Moon © by dcstep, on Flickr Interesting to count craters to see the difference a day makes.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2015, 09:36 PM | #6478 |
Free Thinker
19462
Rep 7,556
Posts |
DC's is bigger than mine.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2015, 10:21 PM | #6479 |
Free Thinker
19462
Rep 7,556
Posts |
Total lunar eclipse this Saturday morning for the West Coast, Ed. Get your timer ready. You might see it, too, DC. If the moon doesn't drop behind the mountains before the eclipse starts.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2015, 11:49 PM | #6482 |
Free Thinker
19462
Rep 7,556
Posts |
^^^^Killer shot.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2015, 11:51 PM | #6483 |
Free Thinker
19462
Rep 7,556
Posts |
Bought a bottle of A'bundah this past weekend. Oh boy is it good.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2015, 10:12 AM | #6485 |
Major General
1298
Rep 7,389
Posts |
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2015, 10:15 AM | #6486 |
Free Thinker
19462
Rep 7,556
Posts |
No doubt.
I'm thinking that the Blue Hour is a much better time to shoot the moon. The deep blue sky just looks better and I think the lower differential between the bright moon and dark sky makes it easier to pull out detail in the moon.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2015, 10:41 AM | #6487 | |
Major General
1298
Rep 7,389
Posts |
Quote:
I was actually shooting in the golden-hour, about 1-hour before sunset. I really think the single most important key, besides focal length , is the angle in the sky. As you get up at 45-degrees and higher, you're shooting through less and less atmosphere, yielding sharper and sharper images. I shot this same moon and hour or two earlier and it wasn't near so sharp. In daylight, like my shot, you shoot around 0EV, but as it gets darker you need more and more -EV. I end up at -2EV in some situations at night. Dave
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2015, 11:08 AM | #6488 |
Major General
1298
Rep 7,389
Posts |
We save that for the guys that lug around a 70-200/f2.8 and then always shoot from f/4 to f/8.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2015, 11:45 AM | #6489 |
Free Thinker
19462
Rep 7,556
Posts |
I have the Sigma 50mm f1.4 Art and the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 Art. I find that shooting wide open with them creates too shallow a DoF in many cases. Both those lenses are sharp wide open, but they get super sharp stopped down just a bit. I often take advantage of that.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2015, 04:30 PM | #6490 | |
Private First Class
62
Rep 198
Posts
Drives: 2021 BMW 540i xDrive Shadowlin
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee
|
Quote:
I use my 24-70 and 70-200 f2.8 at f8 often, and I use my f1.4 at f4~5.6 often. Just depends on what I'm doing. Don't be embarrassed, you're not alone. This photo was shot in a setup I call "The Photo Booth", great for parties, just a white seamless and then a naked strobe pointed at two v-flats behind the camera. Just washes light all over. Notice pretty much everything is in focus. Use a 35mm lens set at f11 to allow focus on singles or group shots with a remote trigger, add some props, and get your drink on. Of course it also helps to shoot teathered to a computer so people can see the results instantly for a good laugh, they tend to take more that way. Capture0136-2 by Reuben Neese, on Flickr |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|