06-25-2014, 08:45 PM | #46 | |
Colonel
1867
Rep 2,556
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 10:09 PM | #48 |
Private
6
Rep 50
Posts |
I'm very surprised, especially with the fact that now they are recalling a bunch of them with vanos bolt crap. I had to pay out of pocket to fix mine and it caused plenty of other damage, and bmw tells me it was a different vanos bolt that broke. Bunch of bs
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 10:23 PM | #49 |
New Member
0
Rep 8
Posts |
N20 Enhancements?
Congrats to the N55!
What will BMW do to upgrade the N20? It lost out the MB....Last year that was first place also. Personally, I think they need to quiet the 4Cyl clatter. Quiet noisy... I know. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 11:23 PM | #50 | |
Banned
3160
Rep 9,134
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 12:13 AM | #51 |
Captain
22
Rep 841
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 02:03 AM | #55 |
First Lieutenant
21
Rep 366
Posts |
The n54 in my e60 535i had the dreaded HPFP issue but boy did I love that engine. The sound of those turbos scrolling up along with that syrupy smooth flat 6 was leagues ahead of everything else. It was the truly special motor. The n55 is fine. But the n54 was the one that stirred the soul.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 05:49 AM | #56 | |
Captain
93
Rep 833
Posts |
Quote:
When the S55 ranks below the N55, and the magazine pretends that the N54 is no longer in production I find it very hard to take their results seriously. And it is not the first year they make this mistake. The N55 is possible lighter, more fuel efficient and more responsive due to less turbo boost compared to the S55. This would also explain why the tri-turbo diesel scores lower than the twin-turbo one. But why would the new Porsche 2.7L beat the N55 last year and then suddenly not this year? It makes very little sense... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 06:17 AM | #57 |
Lieutenant
170
Rep 429
Posts
Drives: G29 Z4 M40i; G05 X5 M50i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Rhineland Palatinate - Germany
|
+1
The N54 is the engine of the 1M. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 07:00 AM | #58 |
New Member
2
Rep 28
Posts |
Which is exactly what the N54 was designed for; it was always intended for low-volume sport models (which is likely how it found its way into the Z4 and 1M) but not for the wide range of duties that the N55 is used for. A couple of things in the N54 design make it less suitable (too expensive to make) as a high-volume engine used across many different platforms, including a forged crank (stronger but more expensive), piezo fuel injectors (fast and precise but much more expensive than solenoid type fuel injectors) and two turbos (with all the associated plumbing as well as the cost of the second turbo).
The N55 is a brilliant engine but I don't think it's appropriate to view it as a replacement for the N54 because for one thing it hasn't replaced the N54 - which is still being made. Those who feel that the N54 is still being used in certain vehicles because BMW is using up inventory don't appear to really understand how the automotive industry works; they simply don't build something as expensive as an engine and put it into inventory hoping to someday find a car to put it into. If an engine exists at all it's because there's a vehicle scheduled for production that takes that engine and the engine will go into that vehicle - probably in much less than 30 days. But perhaps more important is that certifying a car (for emissions and safety) is a BIG undertaking and changing the engine requires re-certifying the car with the new engine - and that's not something a manufacturer is likely to do unless there's a significant cost savings. If the vehicle was certified with an N54 it will continue to use an N54, and N54s will continue to be built for that vehicle. And while the difference is not huge, the dyno tests I've seen support that statement. This may be a design tradeoff to get lower turbo lag; a smaller turbo will spool up faster but flow less air at its maximum. Given the intended use of each engine this makes all the sense in the world to me; the driver of a 1M is more likely to rev higher than the driver of a 5 series sedan. Last edited by JR956678; 06-26-2014 at 07:42 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 08:48 AM | #59 |
Banned
3271
Rep 6,299
Posts |
That's weird, since the dyno's of stock N54's vs N55's tell a different story. I know an N54 is easier to tune (possibly due to the fact it's been around longer and it has two turbos) thus would theoretically make more power easier than an N55 would.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 09:00 AM | #60 | |
Banned
3271
Rep 6,299
Posts |
So I did some research and I think I found an answer thanks to @Scott26.
Turns out the 1M was originally going to use the N55: Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 09:08 AM | #61 | |
Brigadier General
1443
Rep 4,728
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2021 M340i xDrive
Previous: '18 340i xDrive; '15 335 xDrive; '14 435i xDrive; '09 335 E92 xDrive |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 09:50 AM | #62 | |
Banned
3271
Rep 6,299
Posts |
Quote:
I thought he said the N54 out of the box made more power than the N55. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 11:21 AM | #65 | ||
Brigadier General
1443
Rep 4,728
Posts |
Quote:
end-thread
__________________
Current: 2021 M340i xDrive
Previous: '18 340i xDrive; '15 335 xDrive; '14 435i xDrive; '09 335 E92 xDrive |
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 03:27 PM | #66 |
Major General
669
Rep 8,800
Posts |
can u turn a n55 to an s55 -
that's the question / internals- turbo - tuning - more boost -? linear power without drop'n off up top. congrats n55 and hopefully better tuning days coming soon / 2nd wave of more extracted power like n54.
__________________
FrankiE90 AKA:.[The TANK] *CLICK THE SIG
E90s (been gone but not forgotten) KW clubsports 18" BBS GT4 // Build E30 (pending) + E46 M3 Wagon ESTORIL Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|