05-05-2016, 02:42 AM | #1 |
997.1TT
1028
Rep 1,672
Posts |
Is Porsche a bit overpriced..?
[flamesuiton]I've been looking into the price of Porsche lately, as it's one of the only cars I would consider trading the ///M in for. Just to preface, I test drove a Cayman (not the S model) a few years back, and loved it. It was a little under powered, and the transmission was junk IMO, but all in all, it was a great experience and I could definitely see myself behind the wheel of some type of Porsche some day. My problem is: the price.
So I ask the general consensus, are Porsche a bit overpriced (I'm talking your average Porsche, i.e. Cayman, older and cheaper model 911's, not GT3RS, GT2, etc)? If not, what justifies the huge price tag of the new Cayman's and the older 911's? Even the older Cayman's are in the $40's or $50's now, although I remember the Cayman I test drove a few years back being around $29k, and I think it was a 2009ish model? Seems hard to touch a Cayman for under $40k now. I'd take a GT3 in a heartbeat, don't get me wrong. I am sure the driving experience is absolutely sublime, but the price tag on them is way above my pay grade I'm afraid. Even the new Cayman GTS is in the used F430 or Gallardo territory, and the Cayman (atleast the older model) was considered the "poor man's 911". I'll be totally honest, I'm not well versed on Porsche, have only driven the older Cayman, and haven't kept up with anything they've done in the last few years, but to me it seems that the Cayman and the older 911's are pretty pricey for what they are. For the price they cost, I can think of several other "more exotic" cars I would rather have (i.e. Ferrari or Lamborghini).[/flamesuitoff]
__________________
Current: 2007 Porsche 911 Turbo Former: ESS Supercharged ///M3 Interlagos Blue ZCP Subscribe to YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/Rat3dM Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rat3d_m/ |
05-05-2016, 03:44 AM | #2 | |
Lieutenant
712
Rep 445
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Desert
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2017 Range Rover Sp ... [0.00]
2014 McLaren MP4-12C [0.00] 2016 Dodge SRT Viper [0.00] 2012 BMW 640i F13 [0.00] 2015 Nissan Patrol Y62 [0.00] |
Quote:
My advise, if someone is shopping purely for image, Porsche is more exotic than its competitors up to about 120k but over that you're better off buying something truly bespoke. Of course you can get a CPO Porsche if you feel the new cars are overpriced. It's surprising the resale values of the Cayman and Boxster are so high Germany because a 2009 Cayman would be dirt cheap here. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 07:15 AM | #5 |
Second Lieutenant
285
Rep 227
Posts |
This is a tough question to answer as I do find car values to be very subjective. With that being said. I do believe that most sport car manufactures use the 911 as a baseline. Be it performance or price. The 911 has been around for so long that it is a natural benchmark. This allows them to charge a premium.
Although, my old 2015 911 GTS cost about the same as my new BMW. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 08:03 AM | #8 |
First Lieutenant
319
Rep 378
Posts |
I have owned three different 911s (RS America , 993, 996) there is no question in my mind that if you have any intention to drive a vehicle on the track It is cheep to own a Porsche. Mine were indestructible sans the Armco at Lime Rock for the RSA. They just dont brake down unless you dont take care of them, very limited attention actually. You can seriously abuse these cars direct from the factory at the track and take them out to dinner that night. It is truly the best engineered car for the money. If you are over the track experience and just want a nice compliant sports type car to drive less expensive choice abound. You can see my choice i like my car and it does everything i need it to do but even not abused it need a lot of love. You getvwhat you pay for.
Cost of a car for the way it makes you feel or the esthetics of the design well that is subject to your financial reality at th time You decide to open your wallet.As far as buying them for what other people think you have I think a nice Saturn would do the trick for me. |
Appreciate
1
|
05-05-2016, 08:15 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1167
Rep 1,726
Posts |
In terms of cost to run, repairs, parts.....if you think M-tax is bad...Pcar shop time/parts aren't exactly cheap
__________________
My Trackable Street Car
2016 BMW M4 GTS |
Appreciate
1
|
05-05-2016, 08:20 AM | #10 |
First Lieutenant
147
Rep 387
Posts |
I don't have crazy money like that yet, im 23 but the way I see it why would I pay 90 grand for same performance of a 335i? it just doesn't make sense. I think its a mental thing on how enthusiasts say one day I want a "p car". to be honest I think M cars look way better anyway. for the price I wouldn't even if I had the money. its just an image. most of the models aren't that appealing to me.
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-05-2016, 08:23 AM | #11 |
Lieutenant General
4701
Rep 11,962
Posts |
Hell yeh. I had a Porsche Boxster. Maintenance costs were horrendous.
Traded in for 335i and would never go back |
Appreciate
1
|
05-05-2016, 08:31 AM | #12 | |
Major General
4542
Rep 8,942
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2022 Macan S
2016 F31 328i xDrive Sport Wagon 2006 E46 330ci ZHP Convertible |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 08:42 AM | #13 |
Grown Azz Man
437
Rep 3,021
Posts |
Being a 17 year BMW vet and a new P-Car owner I'll say this.....you don't get it until you actually own one. If you want to be king of the stop light races this ain't the car for you. If you are looking for driving dynamics, total mechanical engagement, and just smiles per mile, the P-Car will check all of those boxes and then some. From a price perspective, I think current BMW's are overpriced as well. At least the P-Car will hold value much better......Phil
|
Appreciate
3
|
05-05-2016, 08:47 AM | #14 |
Colonel
2244
Rep 2,702
Posts |
Yeah, overall Porsche is second to Lexus on the reliability chart. It won't leave you stranded, and you won't be afraid putting mileage on it like on BMWs.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 08:53 AM | #15 |
Major General
4351
Rep 6,196
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 08:55 AM | #16 |
Colonel
1755
Rep 2,835
Posts |
By making a list of what they come with and what they will do, no luxury or sports car makes good financial sense or can be justified by "worth it". The market has decided that they are worth what they are being sold for and if you ask random people (or a forum) you will get many that say they are and many that disagree.
Pointless to ask the general question, you have to decide or at least compare them to another option in the same price range or performance type.
__________________
2006 Z4M Coupe - ZHP knob, stubby antenna, clutch delay delete
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 09:06 AM | #17 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1167
Rep 1,726
Posts |
Quote:
IMS bearing? Cooling hose attachment? Engine replacement? Any of those ring a bell? Don't get me wrong, I love PCars, and hopefully forsee a GTcar in my future, but I don't have any misconceptions.
__________________
My Trackable Street Car
2016 BMW M4 GTS |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 09:29 AM | #18 |
Banned
202
Rep 621
Posts |
Most cars could be considered overpriced but it all depends on what people will pay and given Porsche continue to sell 911s at the prices they do, I'd say no. They are one of, if not the best built, most reliable and highest dependability of any car made. Certainly a lot better than anything in its price range. Not to say they don't occasionally have issues, as ALL makers do but theirs are by and large immaterial and they can be abused and driven at the track hard without needing a thing (unlike most other "track ready" street cars). I've wrung mine out at the track before and drove home in comfort and luxury like it hadn't even worked up a sweat.
Also for the guy who made the 335 comment. 335s are not fast and don't handle very well. You'd need any M to qualify there and they still don't handle nearly as well. Other than maybe being faster than a base boxster, it's not in the realm of performance anything else is in the Porsche lineup. And going beyond straight speeds, it isn't comparable in handling, driving dynamics or any other facet of performance or engineering. One could also make the case that a 30k mustang or camaro will beat any 335 or M3 for half the price. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 10:13 AM | #19 |
First Lieutenant
147
Rep 387
Posts |
I drove my friends Cheyenne GTS. nothing special for 100k, looks like a lady bug on the rear as well. just my opinion. to each their own.
GT4 is nice, but I still prefer an M over that, that's just me just how people are JDM fanatics. everyone likes their slice different |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 10:15 AM | #20 |
Brigadier General
3049
Rep 3,654
Posts |
They are worth what people pay for them.
That said, take the starting price of any porsche and times it by 1.5 to come up with the most likely "equipped" selling price. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2016, 10:21 AM | #21 |
First Lieutenant
147
Rep 387
Posts |
if I wanted 0-60 times then I would get awd drive car that's good from the dig like muscle cars.
for me I picked an M3 bc of exterior. driving dynamics handling pure drivers car. fun factor. high rpm driving to get most power to me it has "soul" I do agree Porsches like my friends cayman is excellent to drive as well, but my preference is an M. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|