08-19-2008, 06:19 PM | #1 |
Major General
2276
Rep 5,364
Posts |
New Audi RS5 info (engine + weight figures)
Engine:
4.2 V8. 470bhp, 500Nm 7s S-tronic Weight: 1702kg. It looks like it's going to be more nose heavy than the S5. Design: Test mules are running around with the new front bumper. It has big side intakes like the A3 Clubsport. Should be interesting! On a side note, I seen a silver S5 with RS4 wheels today. It looked MEAN! I can only imagine the presence the RS5 will have on the road.
__________________
|
08-19-2008, 06:35 PM | #3 | |
Smiling Politely
1575
Rep 29,119
Posts |
it happens bro...that being said...my car will be very dated
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 06:37 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant General
1234
Rep 12,446
Posts |
What'd they do to that V8 in order to get another 50 bhp/52 lb-ft out of it?
And 1702 kg comes out to be 3752 lbs. To put that in perspective, an Audi RS4 has 420 bhp/317 lb-ft motivating 3415 pounds of mass. Hmmm...don't know if it'll be much faster. It has another 300 lbs to move, and only 50 more hp/tq to help.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 06:45 PM | #6 | |
Banned
875
Rep 46,010
Posts |
Quote:
that's more hp/torque than M3, and weighs as much i want a C63 now did i just say that??? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 06:55 PM | #7 | |
Lieutenant General
1234
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Quote:
And yeah, the C63 is badass.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 07:10 PM | #9 | |||
Smiling Politely
1575
Rep 29,119
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
nothing wrong with wanting a c63 lol
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 07:22 PM | #10 | |
D to the X to the B!
357
Rep 2,106
Posts |
Quote:
Hmm...if the hp and torque figures are true, I think they are increasing a displacement. I am hoping it's forced induction but many reports point that its unlikely to be applied And bimmer, RS4 doesn't weigh 3415pounds...it weighs around 3848 pounds (tested by edmunds). So that makes the RS5 lighter by around 100 pounds.
__________________
11 corvette C6
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 08:02 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant General
1234
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Haha wow I can't believe I didn't catch that mistake. I just pulled the number off some site when I searched for the curb weight.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 08:11 PM | #13 | |
Second Lieutenant
39
Rep 270
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 08:45 PM | #14 | |
Lieutenant General
643
Rep 10,404
Posts |
Quote:
1. Displacement is wrong 2. Torque is wrong 3. It will get FI |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 08:57 PM | #15 |
Major General
2276
Rep 5,364
Posts |
It's number 2. I think.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 10:31 AM | #16 | |
Lieutenant
86
Rep 418
Posts |
Quote:
its around 3650 dont know where you got your info from |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 10:38 AM | #17 |
D to the X to the B!
357
Rep 2,106
Posts |
Yeh....the torque figure could be wrong....thanks for pointing that out...I never thought about it
__________________
11 corvette C6
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 10:43 AM | #18 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,369
Posts |
Well, I'm cetain of one thing, its going to be a great looking car with great performance.
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 11:05 AM | #19 |
Major General
1226
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Is it known whether the engine is still N/A or FI?
If it's N/A and still 4.2L then to get that amount of power would require a higher rev range. The new DSG is capable of 550Nm and 9000rpm, does this mean the new engine is revving closer to that limit, says 8600rpm. I read somewhere that Valve-lift can increase torque by up to 12%, that would improve the 75ft/lbs per litre of the RS4 engine to 84ft/lbs, that is getting pretty close to the 90ft/lbs being suggested by hkz786. But then look at the S5 engine, it's at 77ft/lbs, add the same 12% improvement and you are at 86ft/lbs. Maybe this figure is starting to look a lot more believable than first thought. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 11:28 AM | #20 | |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,369
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
==================================================
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 11:43 AM | #22 | |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,369
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
==================================================
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|