11-19-2012, 10:03 AM | #1 |
Major
322
Rep 1,035
Posts |
Great Article enjoy!
|
11-19-2012, 10:54 AM | #4 |
Banned
87
Rep 208
Posts |
"One research team recently compared the measurements of Playboy Playmates of the Year from 1960 to 2000 to economic conditions in the United States over the same period and found that tougher times called for larger playmates" lol
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 10:59 AM | #5 |
Major
322
Rep 1,035
Posts |
Oh yeah the worse the economy the more we as a nation love big tits.
The more stable the ecnomy the more we like natural women. It's also a case with shoes, the worse the economy the more likely women will buy slutty pumps. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 11:05 AM | #6 |
Banned
87
Rep 208
Posts |
i can totally relate... the time in my life i was most into car parts: when i had no money. i suppose it's a coping mechanism, or compensating counterbalance.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 11:11 AM | #7 |
Major
322
Rep 1,035
Posts |
A few years ago, Swami and an international group of psychologists led by Martin Tovée of Newcastle University surveyed the female body preferences of men (and women) in the United Kingdom and among the Zulu of South Africa. Participants flipped through a photo booklet of real but blurry-faced women wearing tight gray leotards and rated each one. The Britons gave high marks to slender curves, while the Zulu enjoyed heavier bodies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There is a very non PC joke in this.....about my African Brothes having a thing for the heavey set grey women.....I wonder how my Latin friends did...and don't ven start with my Arab friends....woooooh their love of the thick is a bit....over the top! "Look at her my friend, look at those thighs! I bet if i put a rope around her she could pull my black/white (only two colors acceptable in the Arab community for a BMW) around the block!" Last edited by shah269; 11-19-2012 at 11:30 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 11:44 AM | #8 |
Major
322
Rep 1,035
Posts |
In other words, saying you value physical attractiveness doesn't make you more likely to feel a spark with those you consider physically attractive, the researchers report in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. "When men say they care about physical attractiveness more than women, what that should mean is that attractiveness buys you more romantic desirability if you're a woman than if you're a man," says Eastwick, now at Texas A&M University. "Our study showed that in fact that wasn't the case."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And as Shah says "If she is hot i forgive her!" |
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 12:08 PM | #9 |
Banned
87
Rep 208
Posts |
i really don't discriminate when it comes to looks. some fat girls wear it well, some skinny girls are hot too. only thing is that i'm most attracted to the european look (kindergarten experience, people get programmed so easily)
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 01:28 PM | #10 |
Major
322
Rep 1,035
Posts |
I'm sorry guys, at work, reading this and posting.
Did you get to this part? When the roles were reversed in the 1989 Clark-Hatfield study and men were doing the sexual offering, about half the women accepted the date. Very, very few agreed to come over that night. Not a single one agreed to go to bed. "You've got to be kidding," was a common reply. "What is wrong with you?" was another. 50% just said yes to a date....hu....shit who needs game when you have balls? I LIKE THAT! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 02:07 PM | #11 |
Major
322
Rep 1,035
Posts |
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology that two in five women accept a proposition if they think the man will be good enough in bed.
Oh wow! A full 40% would say yes to a shag if the guy was cute? WTF! I love this shit! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 02:17 PM | #12 |
Banned
87
Rep 208
Posts |
i think it was science channel: there was an experiment where they put complete strangers (pre-rated on looks alone) in a room and asked them to pair up (without talking). result: the hottest paired up, and on down the scale. though most aimed higher at first.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 02:39 PM | #13 |
Major
322
Rep 1,035
Posts |
Oh yeah I remember that one. Based on looks alone and 50/50 yeah.
Include money into the mix, age and push the numbers in each directions and things start getting interesting. Here in NW-NJ where we have 2 dicks for every chick fatties are doing very very well. Meanwhile in NYC where there are 2 chicks for ever 1 dick and half the dicks are gay...well as my friend Krysten says "A good dick is hard to find." As they say with anyting, location location and yes location! And thus why a good door man/door woman is the key to a night clubs survival. you need about 55-60 women to every 50 guys to keep the place "alive" Once it hits 50/50 or or 60/40....just close the place sown. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 02:46 PM | #14 | |
Banned
87
Rep 208
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 03:30 PM | #15 |
Major
322
Rep 1,035
Posts |
Yup! Thus why you just have to live well in or around lare cities. BUT you have to remember, anything greater than 15 miles out of a major city it's craptacular!
Case in point I live all of 30 miles from the center of NYC an it's fat chick land. So if i'm dating I'm dating city girls! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 03:38 PM | #16 | |
Banned
87
Rep 208
Posts |
Quote:
"three things don't stay hidden for long: the sun, the moon, and the truth" --buddha |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|