02-18-2013, 08:59 AM | #1 |
Major General
1940
Rep 6,965
Posts
Drives: 2007 Black/Black 335i e90
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Holly, MI
|
Chevy SS
The all new Chevy SS posts 415 horse power, which is just as much as the current M3, but early test result indicate it can't break 5.0 in a 0-60 test.
Typical American engineering. |
02-18-2013, 09:40 AM | #3 | |
Major
347
Rep 1,326
Posts |
Quote:
There are no early tests that I've seen. Chevy "predicts" 5 seconds. Motor Trend predicts 4.5. And $38,000... You need to compare it to the 328 if you just care about 0-60 Now let's compare the Camaro ZL1 to the M3. Even the $40,000 Camaro SS 1LE is faster around a track than the M5 or M6 Last edited by CirrusSR22; 02-18-2013 at 09:59 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2013, 10:04 AM | #4 | |
Major General
1925
Rep 7,037
Posts
Drives: 15 F80 M3, 22 G01 X3 30i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton, NC
|
Quote:
__________________
2015 F80 ///M3 Sedan 7DCT Tanzanite, 2022 X3 sDrive30i 8AT Brooklyn Grey |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2013, 10:12 AM | #5 | |
Captain
32
Rep 662
Posts |
Quote:
I can tell you the G8 was almost as good as any BMW Ive driven and the Camaro SS 1LE and Cadillac ATS sound amazing in their reviews. I love BMWs but Im not full of kool-aid either. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2013, 02:21 PM | #9 |
Captain
32
Rep 662
Posts |
As opposed to the lightweights from BMW
Camaro SS Length: 190.4 in Width: 75.5 in Wt: 3780 (according to Edmunds) G8 Length: 196.1 in Width: 74.8 in Wt:3885 (according to Edmunds) F30 (335i) Length - 182.5 in Width - 71.3 in Wt:3545 (according to BMWUSA) F10 (550i) Length - 192.8 in Width - 73.2 in Wt:4365 (according to BMWUSA) |
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2013, 02:36 PM | #11 | |
Major General
4458
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Quote:
I must have had my facts wrong, I thought I recalled the old G8 GXP being over 4k pounds. Of course the weight you listed is probably the V6, so the SS is still probably a pig and a half. The Corvette has its weight in check, as does the ATS, so it's strange that the Camaro and the G8/SS are so pudgy. If they brought the SS in around F30 weights, or even within a few hundred pounds, I'll be impressed, but I suspect this won't happen. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2013, 03:12 PM | #12 |
Brigadier General
200
Rep 3,435
Posts |
Weight aside, one thing I don't like: the transmission. No paddle shift, no manual. Kinda takes the fun out of that 415hp motor.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2013, 03:20 PM | #13 | |
Major General
4458
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Quote:
Having said all that, I'd still consider the SS if they make a three pedal car, but as for shift paddles, count me as one who doesn't care. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2013, 03:27 PM | #14 |
Captain
32
Rep 662
Posts |
I think Chevy missed the mark by not offering a manual in this car. The Pontiac GXP had one, not sure why they chose not to with the SS. IMO. the lack of a manual and bland front end styling will hurt this car's chances.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2013, 03:33 PM | #15 |
Major General
4458
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Agreed, I'm hoping there's a hotter version coming, with an available manual, like they did with the G8, with the GT and GXP versions.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2013, 04:00 PM | #16 |
Brigadier General
1048
Rep 3,622
Posts |
No manual is my one gripe with the car. But you can't really fault GM for putting out an affordable car with rear wheel drive, 50/50 weight balance, and a 6.2L V8. My guess is the dual clutch they have in development will find its way in this car.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2013, 02:20 PM | #17 | |
Lieutenant
43
Rep 497
Posts |
Quote:
I just need to hear more detail first. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|