Yoot1 wrote LFP batteries will lower the cost, but also reduce the range. I'm excited by the NMC batteries, like Fisker used for the Ocean.
I don't care about the cost and would pay even more for solid state. Meanwhile, LFP batteries do not propogate their own oxygen in a thermal runaway, as LiIon do making extinguishing the fire incredibly difficult, operate at cooler temperatures, and are far safer than NMC/NCA. Several places no longer allow underground or in parking-deck chargers due to the Lithium Ion problems and intensely unmanageable vehicle fires, ranging from some insurance companies in the US to Korean government buildings in Seoul. I am not an engineer, but worked with many in the industry and an actual battery engineer told me he won't park an NMC/NCA vehicle in his own garage. The one study that someone published to try to show the EVs have fewer fire events than gasoline was flawed, comparing all EV, which are mostly new, to all ICE, and over 70% in the study were 10+ years old. Given all the issues with the Fisker Ocean and the massive quality problems that killed sales and contributed to their bankruptcy, they would seem to be the last ones given as an example to follow! In any event, I don't need the range difference between the two as I will be able to "top off" with the charger I will install in my garage...and LFP batteries can be charged to 100% while Lithium Ion are supposed to not be charged more than 80% and many chargers can now cut off the input at that level. That alone reduces the difference in range. LFP also can take more charging cycles over its lifetime. No LiIon for us!